This PR is a continuation of #4915 by @frederik-uni and @lucasmerlin
that introduces support for keeping egui content within the 'safe area'
on iOS (avoiding the notch / dynamic island / menu bar etc.), with the
following changes:
- `SafeArea` now wraps `MarginF32` and has been renamed to
`SafeAreaInsets` to clarify its purpose.
- `InputState::screen_rect` is now marked as deprecated in favour of
either `viewport_rect` (which contains the entire screen), or
`content_rect` (which is the viewport rect with the safe area insets
removed).
- I added some comments to the safe area insets logic pointing out the
[safe area API coming in winit
v0.31](https://github.com/rust-windowing/winit/issues/3910).
---------
Co-authored-by: frederik-uni <147479464+frederik-uni@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Lucas Meurer <hi@lucasmerlin.me>
Co-authored-by: Emil Ernerfeldt <emil.ernerfeldt@gmail.com>
* Closes https://github.com/rerun-io/rerun/issues/11301
This fixes a bug where a menu could get stuck, not closing at all, when
the currently open submenu stops being shown.
I also added a way to reproduce this to the demo, as well as a test
ensuring that there is no race condition in the fix.
This adds a new mode, `UPDATE_SNAPSHOTS=force`, which will lower the
threshold to zero, overwriting every image that is not _exactly_ the
same.
Most comparisons has a threshold because different GPUs render slightly
differently. However, setting that threshold accurately can be hard.
Sometimes a test will pass locally, but fail on CI. In those cases you
want to force an update of the failing test. You can use
`UPDATE_SNAPSHOTS=force` for that.
And sometimes a small change _should_ update all images, but the change
is so tiny that it falls under the threshold. Still, you want to make a
point of showing that these images have changes. You can use
`UPDATE_SNAPSHOTS=force` for that.
<!--
Please read the "Making a PR" section of
[`CONTRIBUTING.md`](https://github.com/emilk/egui/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md)
before opening a Pull Request!
* Keep your PR:s small and focused.
* The PR title is what ends up in the changelog, so make it descriptive!
* If applicable, add a screenshot or gif.
* If it is a non-trivial addition, consider adding a demo for it to
`egui_demo_lib`, or a new example.
* Do NOT open PR:s from your `master` branch, as that makes it hard for
maintainers to test and add commits to your PR.
* Remember to run `cargo fmt` and `cargo clippy`.
* Open the PR as a draft until you have self-reviewed it and run
`./scripts/check.sh`.
* When you have addressed a PR comment, mark it as resolved.
Please be patient! I will review your PR, but my time is limited!
-->
Adds a check for `ui.is_enabled()` when displaying the SubMenu items.
There were a few places the condition could be placed, but I figured
there was simplest. The inner button will already not be able to be
clicked due to ui being disabled.
cc @lucasmerlin
* [x] I have followed the instructions in the PR template
---------
Co-authored-by: Emil Ernerfeldt <emil.ernerfeldt@gmail.com>
Fixes manually created popups (via `Popup::new`) not closing, since
widget_clicked_elsewhere was always false.
This example would never close:
```rs
let mut open = true;
eframe::run_simple_native("My egui App", options, move |ctx, _frame| {
egui::CentralPanel::default().show(ctx, |ui| {
let response = egui::Popup::new(
Id::new("popup"),
ctx.clone(),
PopupAnchor::Position(Pos2::new(10.0, 10.0)),
LayerId::new(Order::Foreground, Id::new("popup")),
)
.open(open)
.show(|ui| {
ui.label("This is a popup!");
ui.label("You can put anything in here.");
});
if let Some(response) = response {
if response.response.should_close() {
open = false;
}
}
});
})
```
I also noticed that the Color submenu in the popups example had a double
arrow (must have been broken in the atoms PR):
<img width="248" height="110" alt="Screenshot 2025-08-07 at 13 42 28"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a4e0c267-ae71-4b2c-a1f0-f53f9662d026"
/>
Also fixed this in the PR.
* Closes #7037
* Closes#7297
This deprecates all popup-related function in `Memory`, replacing them
with the new `egui::Popup`.
The new API is nicer in all ways, so we should encourage people to use
it.
* [x] I have followed the instructions in the PR template
Splitting this out from the Parley work as requested. This removes
`FontImage` and makes the font atlas use a `ColorImage`. It converts
alpha to coverage at glyph-drawing time, not at delta-upload time.
This doesn't do much now, but will allow for color emoji rendering once
we start using Parley.
I've changed things around so that we pass in `text_alpha_to_coverage`
to the `Fonts` the same way we do with `pixels_per_point` and
`max_texture_side`, reusing the existing code to check if the setting
differs and recreating the font atlas if so. I'm not quite sure why this
wasn't done in the first place.
I've left `ImageData` as an enum for now, in case we want to add support
for more texture pixel formats in the future (which I personally think
would be worthwhile). If you'd like, I can just remove that enum
entirely.
* part of https://github.com/emilk/egui/issues/7264
* removes SelectableLabel (Use `Button::selectable` instead)
* updates `Ui::selectable_value/label` with IntoAtoms support
Had to make some changes to `Button` since the SelecatbleLabel had no
frame unless selected.
I thought about this - so we have two options here:
1. adding it to `SnapshotOptions`
2. adding it to every function which I do not like as this would be a
huge breaking change
## Summary
This pull request introduces a new feature to the `SnapshotOptions`
struct in the `egui_kittest` crate, allowing users to specify a
permissible percentage of pixel differences (`diff_percentage`) before a
snapshot comparison is considered a failure. This feature provides more
flexibility in handling minor visual discrepancies during snapshot
testing.
### Additions to `SnapshotOptions`:
* Added a new field `diff_percentage` of type `Option<f64>` to the
`SnapshotOptions` struct. This field allows users to define a tolerance
for pixel differences, with a default value of `None` (interpreted as 0%
tolerance).
* Updated the `Default` implementation of `SnapshotOptions` to
initialize `diff_percentage` to `None`.
### Integration into snapshot comparison logic:
* Updated the `try_image_snapshot_options` function to handle the new
`diff_percentage` field. If a `diff_percentage` is specified, the
function calculates the percentage of differing pixels and allows the
snapshot to pass if the difference is within the specified tolerance.
[[1]](diffhunk://#diff-6f481b5866b82a4fe126b7df2e6c9669040c79d1d200d76b87f376de5dec5065R204)
[[2]](diffhunk://#diff-6f481b5866b82a4fe126b7df2e6c9669040c79d1d200d76b87f376de5dec5065R294-R301)
* Closes <https://github.com/emilk/egui/issues/5683>
* [x] I have followed the instructions in the PR template
---------
Co-authored-by: lucasmerlin <hi@lucasmerlin.me>
Co-authored-by: Emil Ernerfeldt <emil.ernerfeldt@gmail.com>
This adds a custom Node struct with proper support for egui types
(`Key`, `Modifiers`, `egui::Event`, `Rect`) instead of needing to use
the kittest / accesskit types.
I also changed the `click` function to do a proper mouse move / mouse
down instead of the accesskit click. Also added `accesskit_click` to
trigger the accesskit event. This resulted in some changed snapshots,
since the elements are now hovered.
Also renamed `press_key` to `key_press` for consistency with
`key_down/key_up`.
Also removed the Deref to the AccessKit Node, to make it clearer when to
expect egui and when to expect accesskit types.
* Closes#5705
* [x] I have followed the instructions in the PR template
Today each widget does its own custom layout, which has some drawbacks:
- not very flexible
- you can add an `Image` to `Button` but it will always be shown on the
left side
- you can't add a `Image` to a e.g. a `SelectableLabel`
- a lot of duplicated code
This PR introduces `Atoms` and `AtomLayout` which abstracts over "widget
content" and layout within widgets, so it'd be possible to add images /
text / custom rendering (for e.g. the checkbox) to any widget.
A simple custom button implementation is now as easy as this:
```rs
pub struct ALButton<'a> {
al: AtomicLayout<'a>,
}
impl<'a> ALButton<'a> {
pub fn new(content: impl IntoAtomics) -> Self {
Self { al: content.into_atomics() }
}
}
impl<'a> Widget for ALButton<'a> {
fn ui(mut self, ui: &mut Ui) -> Response {
let response = ui.ctx().read_response(ui.next_auto_id());
let visuals = response.map_or(&ui.style().visuals.widgets.inactive, |response| {
ui.style().interact(&response)
});
self.al.frame = self
.al
.frame
.inner_margin(ui.style().spacing.button_padding)
.fill(visuals.bg_fill)
.stroke(visuals.bg_stroke)
.corner_radius(visuals.corner_radius);
self.al.show(ui)
}
}
```
The initial implementation only does very basic layout, just enough to
be able to implement most current egui widgets, so:
- only horizontal layout
- everything is centered
- a single item may grow/shrink based on the available space
- everything can be contained in a Frame
There is a trait `IntoAtoms` that conveniently allows you to construct
`Atoms` from a tuple
```
ui.button((Image::new("image.png"), "Click me!"))
```
to get a button with image and text.
This PR reimplements three egui widgets based on the new AtomLayout:
- Button
- matches the old button pixel-by-pixel
- Button with image is now [properly
aligned](https://github.com/emilk/egui/pull/5830/files#diff-962ce2c68ab50724b01c6b64c683c4067edd9b79fcdcb39a6071021e33ebe772)
in justified layouts
- selected button style now matches SelecatbleLabel look
- For some reason the DragValue text seems shifted by a pixel almost
everywhere, but I think it's more centered now, yay?
- Checkbox
- basically pixel-perfect but apparently the check mesh is very slightly
different so I had to update the snapshot
- somehow needs a bit more space in some snapshot tests?
- RadioButton
- pixel-perfect
- somehow needs a bit more space in some snapshot tests?
I plan on updating TextEdit based on AtomLayout in a separate PR (so
you could use it to add a icon within the textedit frame).
This fixes bugs related to how an `Image` follows the size of an SVG.
We track the "source size" of each image, i.e. the original width/height
of the SVG, which can be different from whatever it was rasterized as.
* Closes https://github.com/emilk/egui/issues/3501
The problem occurs when you want to render the same SVG at different
scales, either at the same time in different parts of your UI, or at two
different times (e.g. the DPI changes).
The solution is to use the `SizeHint` as part of the key.
However, when you have an SVG in a resizable container, that can lead to
hundreds of versions of the same SVG. So new eviction code is added to
handle this case.
This helped me benchmark the atomic layout (#5830) changes.
I also realized that the label benchmark wasn't testing the painting,
since the buttons at some point will be placed outside the screen_rect,
meaning it won't be painted.
This fixes it by benching the label in a child ui.
The `label &str` benchmark went from 483 ns to 535 ns with these
changes.
EDIT:
I fixed another benchmark problem, since the benchmark would show the
same widget millions of times for a single frame, the WidgetRects
hashmap would get huge, causing each iteration to slow down a bit more
and causing the benchmark to have unreliable results.
With this the `label &str` benchmark went from 535ns to 298ns. Also the
`label format!` benchmark now takes almost the same time (302 ns).
Before, it was a lot slower since it reused the same Context which
already had millions of widget ids.
