* [x] I have followed the instructions in the PR template
This PR have two commits:
* **First commit** - introduction of tests and their canonization image.
Expected behaviour is that `horizontal_wrapped_multiline_row_height`
would match `horizontal_wrapped_multiline_row_height_reference`, but it
doesn't. There is a bug in `horizontal_wrapped` that breaks line height
after using `text_edit_multiline`.
* **Second commit** - fix. You can see that
`horizontal_wrapped_multiline_row_height` now looks like
`horizontal_wrapped_multiline_row_height_reference` (although it's not a
perfect match, upd: found, this is because of this issue:
https://github.com/emilk/egui/issues/4921).
I have used LLM to help me with this PR (codex + claude code).
BTW, I'm using horizontal_wrapped with end_row instead of vertical +
horizontal alternation, because I automatically generate my UI through
some complex interactions between elements in my code, and it's can be
that my `horizontal` starts in one function, and ends in another.
Something like `begin_horizontal`/`end_horizontal`/`get_current_layout`
would be very handy, related to
https://github.com/emilk/egui/issues/1004.
Also, I would like indent to be supported in `horizontal_wrapped`, or
also, to have `indent_start`/`indent_end`. This is why I used
`monospace("| ")` in my example, it simulates my use-case.
<!--
Please read the "Making a PR" section of
[`CONTRIBUTING.md`](https://github.com/emilk/egui/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md)
before opening a Pull Request!
* Keep your PR:s small and focused.
* The PR title is what ends up in the changelog, so make it descriptive!
* If applicable, add a screenshot or gif.
* If it is a non-trivial addition, consider adding a demo for it to
`egui_demo_lib`, or a new example.
* Do NOT open PR:s from your `master` branch, as that makes it hard for
maintainers to test and add commits to your PR.
* Remember to run `cargo fmt` and `cargo clippy`.
* Open the PR as a draft until you have self-reviewed it and run
`./scripts/check.sh`.
* When you have addressed a PR comment, mark it as resolved.
Please be patient! I will review your PR, but my time is limited!
-->
This is a fix/improvement that makes all kinds of alignments work in
`TextEdit` when a custom `LayoutJob` with halign is used.
I used the simplest approach possible to avoid unwanted bugs as I wasn't
sure what's safe to change, but there's potentially better ways to
achieve this. In particular, I'm not sure I fully understand the
rationale behind aligning rows in a `Galley` based on the latter's
leftmost border, considering the size is what's ultimately used in
widgets (in `TextEdit` at least).
Regardless, here's a demo of this PR:
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/5d9801d7-73af-4576-80c5-47f169700462
* [x] I have followed the instructions in the PR template
---------
Co-authored-by: Emil Ernerfeldt <emil.ernerfeldt@gmail.com>
- fix for https://github.com/rerun-io/reality/pull/1075
The galleys row size was calculated by looking at the last glyphs pos_x,
which got changed to be rounded to integers when we added subpixel
binning. This introduced a subtle bug which caused the width of galleys
to be slightly off.
This PR fixes this by looking at the actual cursor position instead,
which is not rounded.
Also added a test to ensure this is correct. Previously, for the second
and last line, the `x` was too close to the `0`.
<img width="48" height="67" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a69a4cc3-b3f3-4553-ab92-73cb2e7a358c"
/>
---------
Co-authored-by: lucasmerlin <8009393+lucasmerlin@users.noreply.github.com>
* Part of https://github.com/emilk/egui/issues/5605
This changes the default style of egui.
The problem with "expanding" widgets is that they now want to paint
outside their own bounds, which then requires all parent UIs to have
proper margins.
It also means hovered things are no longer properly aligned with every
other widget.
<!--
Please read the "Making a PR" section of
[`CONTRIBUTING.md`](https://github.com/emilk/egui/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md)
before opening a Pull Request!
* Keep your PR:s small and focused.
* The PR title is what ends up in the changelog, so make it descriptive!
* If applicable, add a screenshot or gif.
* If it is a non-trivial addition, consider adding a demo for it to
`egui_demo_lib`, or a new example.
* Do NOT open PR:s from your `master` branch, as that makes it hard for
maintainers to test and add commits to your PR.
* Remember to run `cargo fmt` and `cargo clippy`.
* Open the PR as a draft until you have self-reviewed it and run
`./scripts/check.sh`.
* When you have addressed a PR comment, mark it as resolved.
Please be patient! I will review your PR, but my time is limited!
-->
* Closes N/A
* [x] I have followed the instructions in the PR template
I'll probably come back to this and clean it up a bit. This PR
reimplements ab_glyph's functionality on top of Skrifa, a somewhat
lower-level font API that's being used in Chrome now.
Skrifa doesn't perform rasterization itself, so I'm using
[vello_cpu](https://github.com/linebender/vello) from the Linebender
project for rasterization. It's still in its early days, but I believe
it's already quite fast. It also supports color and gradient fills, so
color emoji support will be easier.
Skrifa also supports font hinting, which should make text look a bit
nicer / less blurry.
Here's the current ab_glyph rendering:
<img width="1592" height="1068" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/2385b66e-23f8-4c6e-b8c2-ea90e0eea4e4"
/>
Here's Skrifa *without* hinting--it looks almost identical, but there
are some subpixel differences, probably due to rasterizer behavior:
<img width="1592" height="1068" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a815f3e9-65ac-4940-bc00-571177bef53d"
/>
Here's Skrifa *with* hinting:
<img width="1592" height="1068" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d6cc0669-3537-4377-bba9-ed5ef09664db"
/>
Hinting does make the horizontal strokes look a bit bolder, which makes
me wonder once again about increasing the font weight from "light" to
"regular".
---------
Co-authored-by: Emil Ernerfeldt <emil.ernerfeldt@gmail.com>
* follow up to #7514
That PR changed the tooltip to preserve the wrapping, which made the
tooltip kind of useless. With this PR the wrapping is reset for the
tooltip.
This adds a new mode, `UPDATE_SNAPSHOTS=force`, which will lower the
threshold to zero, overwriting every image that is not _exactly_ the
same.
Most comparisons has a threshold because different GPUs render slightly
differently. However, setting that threshold accurately can be hard.
Sometimes a test will pass locally, but fail on CI. In those cases you
want to force an update of the failing test. You can use
`UPDATE_SNAPSHOTS=force` for that.
And sometimes a small change _should_ update all images, but the change
is so tiny that it falls under the threshold. Still, you want to make a
point of showing that these images have changes. You can use
`UPDATE_SNAPSHOTS=force` for that.
Today each widget does its own custom layout, which has some drawbacks:
- not very flexible
- you can add an `Image` to `Button` but it will always be shown on the
left side
- you can't add a `Image` to a e.g. a `SelectableLabel`
- a lot of duplicated code
This PR introduces `Atoms` and `AtomLayout` which abstracts over "widget
content" and layout within widgets, so it'd be possible to add images /
text / custom rendering (for e.g. the checkbox) to any widget.
A simple custom button implementation is now as easy as this:
```rs
pub struct ALButton<'a> {
al: AtomicLayout<'a>,
}
impl<'a> ALButton<'a> {
pub fn new(content: impl IntoAtomics) -> Self {
Self { al: content.into_atomics() }
}
}
impl<'a> Widget for ALButton<'a> {
fn ui(mut self, ui: &mut Ui) -> Response {
let response = ui.ctx().read_response(ui.next_auto_id());
let visuals = response.map_or(&ui.style().visuals.widgets.inactive, |response| {
ui.style().interact(&response)
});
self.al.frame = self
.al
.frame
.inner_margin(ui.style().spacing.button_padding)
.fill(visuals.bg_fill)
.stroke(visuals.bg_stroke)
.corner_radius(visuals.corner_radius);
self.al.show(ui)
}
}
```
The initial implementation only does very basic layout, just enough to
be able to implement most current egui widgets, so:
- only horizontal layout
- everything is centered
- a single item may grow/shrink based on the available space
- everything can be contained in a Frame
There is a trait `IntoAtoms` that conveniently allows you to construct
`Atoms` from a tuple
```
ui.button((Image::new("image.png"), "Click me!"))
```
to get a button with image and text.
This PR reimplements three egui widgets based on the new AtomLayout:
- Button
- matches the old button pixel-by-pixel
- Button with image is now [properly
aligned](https://github.com/emilk/egui/pull/5830/files#diff-962ce2c68ab50724b01c6b64c683c4067edd9b79fcdcb39a6071021e33ebe772)
in justified layouts
- selected button style now matches SelecatbleLabel look
- For some reason the DragValue text seems shifted by a pixel almost
everywhere, but I think it's more centered now, yay?
- Checkbox
- basically pixel-perfect but apparently the check mesh is very slightly
different so I had to update the snapshot
- somehow needs a bit more space in some snapshot tests?
- RadioButton
- pixel-perfect
- somehow needs a bit more space in some snapshot tests?
I plan on updating TextEdit based on AtomLayout in a separate PR (so
you could use it to add a icon within the textedit frame).
