## Summary
- [x] I have followed the instructions in the PR template
Fixes comment-style violations of the `CONTRIBUTING.md` code style rule:
> `// Comment like this.` and not `//like this`
### Files changed
- `crates/epaint/src/shapes/bezier_shape.rs`: `//temporary solution` →
`// temporary solution`, and 22× `//add the start point` → `// add the
start point`
- `crates/egui/src/animation_manager.rs`: `//start new animation…` → `//
start new animation…`
- `crates/eframe/src/web/web_painter_wgpu.rs`:
`//create_new.instance_descriptor…` → `//
create_new.instance_descriptor…`
No code logic changes — only adding the missing space after `//` in
inline and standalone comments.
## Test plan
- [x] `cargo fmt --check`
- [x] `cargo clippy -p epaint -p egui`
- [x] `cargo test -p epaint --lib`
### What
From the [lint
description](https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html?search=or_fu#or_fun_call):
> The function will always be called. This is only bad if it allocates
or does some non-trivial amount of work.
But also:
> If the function has side-effects, not calling it will change the
semantic of the program, but you shouldn’t rely on that.
>
> The lint also cannot figure out whether the function you call is
actually expensive to call or not.
Still worth it to keep our happy paths clean, imo.